Legislature(2021 - 2022)
2021-05-10 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1001 HB 71 The following, which was moved to the bottom of the calendar (page 943), was read the third time: CS FOR HOUSE BILL NO. 71(FIN) "An Act making appropriations for the operating and capital expenses of the state's integrated comprehensive mental health program; making supplemental appropriations; and providing for an effective date." Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that CSHB 71(FIN) be returned to second reading for all amendments. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Tuck, citing Section 357(b) of Mason's Manual, moved and asked unanimous consent to limit debate to two minutes on HB 71 and the amendments to the bill. Representative Eastman objected. The question being: "Shall the debate be limited to 2 minutes on CSHB 71(FIN)?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) Second Reading Limit debate to 2 minutes YEAS: 22 NAYS: 17 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Cronk, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Excused: Patkotak And so, the motion passed. 2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1002 Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representatives Wool, Thompson, Merrick, Foster, Edgmon, and Stutes: Page 7, line 24: Delete "5,167,100" Insert "4,667,100" Delete "987,200" Insert "487,200" Page 7, line 25: Delete "4,679,900" Insert "4,179,900" Page 9, line 21: Delete "138,785,200" Insert "138,285,200" Page 9, line 23: Delete "20,624,500" Insert "21,124,500" Page 10, line 13: Delete all material. Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative Wool moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 39 NAYS: 0 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1003 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool, Zulkosky Excused: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 1 was adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative McCarty: Page 4, line 20: Delete "5,626,900" in both places Insert "2,226,900" in both places Page 4, line 23: Delete "3,548,500" Insert "148,500" Page 9, line 24: Delete "10,825,900" Insert "7,425,900" Adjust fund sources and totals accordingly. Representative McCarty moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. There was objection. Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative McCarty: Page 1, line 10 of the amendment: Delete: “10,825,900” Insert: “14,225,900” Representative McCarty moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 be adopted. 2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1004 There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 31 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Claman, Cronk, Eastman, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kreiss-Tomkins, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Merrick, Nelson, Prax, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Vance, Wool Nays: Drummond, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Ortiz, Spohnholz, Story, Zulkosky Absent: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 1 to Amendment No. 2 was adopted. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 as amended be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 2 as amended YEAS: 16 NAYS: 23 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Thompson, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 2 as amended was not adopted. 2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1005 Amendment No. 3 was offered by Representative Eastman: Page 6, lines 28-29: Delete all material Representative Eastman moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 3 be adopted. There was objection. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 3 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) am Second Reading Amendment No. 3 YEAS: 12 NAYS: 27 EXCUSED: 0 ABSENT: 1 Yeas: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Johnson, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McKay, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Tilton, Vance Nays: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Prax, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Absent: Patkotak And so, Amendment No. 3 was not adopted. Representative Tuck moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Patkotak be excused from the call of the House today. There being no objection, it was so ordered. CSHB 71(FIN) am was automatically in third reading. The question being: "Shall CSHB 71(FIN) am pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) am Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 25 NAYS: 14 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 2021-05-10 House Journal Page 1006 Yeas: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, Merrick, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Schrage, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, McCabe, McCarty, McKay, Nelson, Prax, Rauscher, Shaw, Tilton, Vance Excused: Patkotak And so, CSHB 71(FIN) am passed the House. Representative Tuck moved the effective date clause. The question being: "Shall the effective date clause be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: CSHB 71(FIN) am Third Reading Effective Date YEAS: 31 NAYS: 8 EXCUSED: 1 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Claman, Cronk, Drummond, Edgmon, Fields, Foster, Hannan, Hopkins, Johnson, Josephson, Kreiss-Tomkins, LeBon, McCabe, McCarty, Merrick, Nelson, Ortiz, Rasmussen, Rauscher, Schrage, Shaw, Snyder, Spohnholz, Story, Stutes, Tarr, Thompson, Tilton, Tuck, Wool, Zulkosky Nays: Carpenter, Eastman, Gillham, Kaufman, Kurka, McKay, Prax, Vance Excused: Patkotak And so, the effective date clause was adopted. CSHB 71(FIN) am was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment.